Cyberlibel

Cyberlibel Definition
Cyberlibel is the act of posting false and damaging claims about someone online to harm their reputation. This can happen through social media posts, blog posts, comments, or online reviews.
The word combines “cyber” (online) and “libel” (a written defamation). Unlike traditional libel, cyberlibel occurs in digital spaces, where a post can spread quickly and cause significant and long-lasting damage. In some countries, it may lead to serious legal repercussions for the person accused of defamatory behavior.
What Makes a Post Cyberlibel?
Cyberlibel laws can differ from country to country, but they usually share the same core features. In most places, a post could be considered cyberlibel if:
- It makes a false statement, harming a person’s, organization’s, or group’s reputation.
- It’s communicated publicly or privately to at least one person other than the target.
- The author knows the information is false or posts it with reckless disregard for the truth.
- It refers to a specific person, business, or group—living or dead—and others can reasonably identify who it’s about.
- It’s shared using a digital platform, such as social media, email, blogs, or messaging apps.
Examples of Cyberlibel
While cyberlibel comes in many forms and no two situations are the same, here are some of the most common examples:
False Accusations on Social Media
Someone posts a video on YouTube or writes a Facebook status claiming their former employer was engaging in tax evasion. They know the claim is false and damages the person’s professional reputation.
Fake Business Reviews
A person leaves a one-star review on a restaurant's Google profile, saying the owner cheats customers, even if it isn’t true. This false review unfairly hurts the business’s reputation and its ability to generate income.
Defamatory Blog Posts
A popular blogger writes an article claiming another public figure has a questionable or criminal background when it’s not true. It causes a scandal, and as a result, they suffer serious reputational damage.
Deepfakes or AI-Generated Content
Someone generates and shares manipulated content online, showing a person engaging in illegal, immoral, or embarrassing acts, or saying things they never said. It leads to public outrage, emotional distress, or even legal consequences for the person falsely depicted.
Cyberlibel vs Other Online Behaviors

Cyberlibel is just one type of harmful online behavior, but it’s often confused with other terms. Here's how they differ:
- Cyberlibel is online defamation, like a blog, social media post, or comment.
- Slander is spoken defamation, like something said in a livestream, podcast, or video.
- Libel is written defamation in general; if it’s online, it becomes cyberlibel.
- Defamation is the umbrella term that includes both libel and slander.
- Online harassment involves repeated threats or abuse.
- Trolling is when someone tries to upset or provoke others online, often just for attention, including potentially offensive memes or images.
How to Respond to Cyberlibel
If you’re targeted by cyberlibel, stay calm. Avoid reacting publicly or escalating the issue before giving it careful thought. Instead:
- Take screenshots of the post, including the date and time.
- Save links and usernames as evidence.
- Report the content to the platform where it was posted.
- Avoid engaging with the person directly.
If it’s feasible, consider contacting a legal professional who works in defamation. They can guide you on filing a complaint or taking legal action.
Defending Against Cyberlibel Charges
While cyberlibel is an extremely harmful action, it’s important to remember that not everything you say about someone else online is cyberlibel—even if it’s negative. As long as it’s clearly your opinion or a true statement, you’re usually within your rights to say it.
Defenses against cyberlibel claims are often based on:
- Truth. If your claims are factually accurate, they’re not considered cyberlibel, even when they’re potentially damaging to the person’s reputation.
- Honest opinion or fair comment. It’s not cyberlibel when it’s clear a statement is your opinion, based on facts, and made without malicious intent.
- Absolute privilege. A statement is fully protected if it’s made in official settings like courts or legislatures.
- Qualified privilege. When statements are made in good faith as part of a legal, moral, or social duty, they can be defended and likely won’t be considered cyberlibel.
- Consent. If the person involved agreed to have the content published, it can’t be considered libelous.
- No actual malice. A statement doesn’t count as cyberlibel if you didn’t know it was false or it didn't show a reckless disregard for the truth.
Read More:
- What Is Cyber Harassment?
- Guide: What Is Doxxing and How to Protect Yourself Online
- How to Identify and Prevent Cyberbullying
FAQs
First, cyberlibel must involve a defamatory statement harming someone's reputation. Second, the statement must be published or shared online. Third, the target person must be clearly identifiable. Finally, it must be possible to prove the statement was made with malice or a reckless disregard for the truth.
A private message could be considered libelous if it’s shared with others or forwarded widely. However, private messages sent to the person the message is targeted at generally don’t count as cyberlibel because no third party has seen the libelous content or claims.
Cyberlibel can be a crime or a civil offense, depending on the laws in the country you’re in. Some places, like the Philippines, consider it a criminal offense under specific laws. Others, like the United States, usually treat it as a civil matter. The legal consequences, like fines, compensation, or even jail time, vary based on jurisdiction. You should check local laws if you want to understand how cyberlibel is handled in a specific region.
It can be, depending on the jurisdiction. If the post you’re engaging with contributes to reputational damage, you could face legal consequences. However, not all countries treat this the same way—some require you to actively participate in spreading the defamatory message, while others consider passive engagement cyberlibel.