FCFS

Three ghosties in a queue in front of a desktop showing the CyberGhost VPN app, to demonstrate the FCFS algorithm.

FCFS Definition

FCFS stands for First-Come, First-Served. It’s a scheduling algorithm used in computing to manage tasks in the exact order they arrive. As the name suggests, there’s no reordering or jumping the queue—the first task requested is the first one handled. FCFS is also non-preemptive, which means each task runs to completion once it starts.

You’ll find FCFS in operating systems (scheduling processes on the CPU), network routers (sending data packets), and web servers (handling incoming requests).

How FCFS Works

FCFS is predictable—it handles tasks in the order they arrive, even if the next task in line could be completed quicker. Here’s how it works:

  1. Queue initialization: The system starts with an empty task queue.
  2. Task arrival: As new tasks come in, they’re added to the end of the queue.
  3. Task execution: The scheduler grabs the task at the front of the queue and assigns it to the CPU (processor).
  4. Completion and removal: After finishing the task, the system removes it from the queue.
  5. Repeat: The next task moves to the front of the queue, and the process repeats.

Imagine it like a line at a coffee shop. You order a cappuccino with all the optional extras and get in line. Someone behind you just wants a bottle of water. It doesn’t matter that their request is quicker, they still have to wait their turn—just like tasks in FCFS.

Key Characteristics of FCFS

FCFS has certain characteristics that make it easy to spot:

Advantages and Disadvantages of FCFS

FCFS is simple by design, but this can come at the cost of speed and flexibility. Other factors, such as operating systems and process scheduling, can also affect the average wait time, efficiency, and response time.

Advantages of FCFS

Disadvantages of FCFS

Read More

FAQ

FCFS stands for First-Come, First-Served. It’s a basic scheduling algorithm that runs tasks in the order they arrive. It’s often used in operating systems, networks, and simple queue systems.

Not usually. Real-time systems often need faster response times and stricter timing control. Since FCFS doesn’t prioritize urgent tasks, it’s not the best fit for real-time systems.

No. FCFS is easy to implement, but it isn’t the most efficient scheduling algorithm, especially when dealing with mixed workloads. It can cause delays if long tasks hold up shorter ones in the queue.

FCFS’s main strengths are simplicity, fairness, and predictability. It handles tasks in chronological order, which makes the system easy to follow and debug.

Waiting time in FCFS depends on where a task is in the queue. Tasks at the front are handled first, so those at the back wait longer. Waiting times can be increased if the task at the front is resource-heavy.

×

Time to Step up Your Digital Protection

The 2-Year Plan Is Now
Available for only /mo

undefined 45-Day Money-Back Guarantee