This week we’re rallying around something you can’t necessarily see or feel, and something you definitely can’t taste, but it’s absolutely something you can’t live without. This juggernaut is called the internet, and every March 12 we pause to reflect on our digital rights.

World Day Against Cyber-Censorship was started by the team at Reporters Without Borders, an international non-profit that safeguards the right to freedom of information. They gave rise to this online event as a way to celebrate free expression on the internet. Depending on your location, the idea of “free expression on the internet” may seem like either a birthright and not something you think much about or a challenging problem you struggle against every day.

But what is censorship, anyway?

Censorship is nothing new — it’s the suppression of information by a government, school, private institution, or corporation. But internet censorship is still the wild, wild west because no one quite knows how far it will go, or how bad it will get.

There’s certainly no global consensus about how to maintain transparency online but that’s because the reality is, not all nations are created equal. Many countries face censorship or other assaults on their digital rights — one study by Freedom House, a think tank and research nonprofit, found that 26 out of 65 countries assessed in 2019 experienced a deterioration in internet freedom.

Since 2010, Reporters Without Borders has also published an “Enemies of the Internet” list (more on that below) and awarded a Netizen Prize to recognize a cyber-dissident who has contributed to promoting free expression on the internet. The winners tend to be bloggers and individuals hailing from countries with the least press freedoms (Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Eritrea, China, Vietnam, Sudan, Syria, Djibouti, Laos, and Cuba).

Think about the fact that more than seventy percent of imprisoned journalists were arrested for activities conducted on the internet.

Are you a journalist? Reach out and be safe — we offer our service for free to organizations that actively fight for a free and secure internet. Find more details here.

Seven out of 10 imprisoned reporters were arrested for their online activities! The question then becomes how the average person’s internet activities are being censored and/or otherwise monitored, and the steps necessary to stay safe online.

Some say internet censorship is a good thing — primarily it’s praised for stopping the spread of so-called “fake news” and limiting access to harmful activities. But who gets to decide what is acceptable or unacceptable? After all, many governments censor online material to block political information and control its citizens.

As a response, some current forms of internet censorship are making the Dark Web go commercial! The BBC, ProPublica, Facebook, the Guardian, and the New Yorker are just some outlets that have launched sites to make their news available in countries where media is restricted. These special websites do not track cookies or keep logs.

Governments often use censorship for political purposes—if there is a lack of information sharing in society, then it is easier to manipulate outcomes. In order to circumvent these barriers, journalists and news outlets have begun to normalize the use of the dark web to reach populations traditionally barred from knowing the truth. This solidifies the idea that the dark web is indeed going commercial.

The Georgetown Public Policy Review

Some of the countries cited by the Georgetown study seem like no-brainers (think: China, Syria, North Korea) but did you know that the United Kingdom and United States are also among the countries with the highest level of internet censorship and surveillance? Yes, that’s right, since 2014 and with no sign of moving off its list, the U.S. and U.K. are there alongside others like Cuba, Vietnam, Bahrain, and Turkmenistan!

When Reporters Without Borders initially added the two countries to its Enemies of the Internet list, it cited “intolerable” mass surveillance methods while asking “how will so-called democratic countries be able to press for the protection of journalists if they adopt the very practices they are criticizing authoritarian regimes for?”

Both the United Kingdom and United States are also part of something called the “Five Eyes” alliance, working with intelligence agencies from Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Some privacy advocates think the Five Eyes intelligence-gathering methods violate online privacy rights because too much data is collected. For example, if Australia has information about a person, that information is accessible to the other four countries (and possibly even more countries).

The trouble with online censors

Censorship is a tricky business. For example, Internet Service Provider filtering in the United Kingdom means internet users there are prohibited from accessing a range of websites by default, including topics such as sex education, advice on sexual health, support services for rape and domestic abuse, and addiction and recovery services. As one researcher told the Independent, “sometimes these are American companies that have slightly different cultural values to us,” but significant underblocking has also been reported (hello #NSFW).

Across the pond, while the U.S. government doesn’t censor online content, it does abide by the First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech, among other inalienable rights.

As the free speech experts from EFF point out, “for every high-profile case of despicable content being taken down, there are many, many more stories of people in marginalized communities who are targets of persecution and violence. The powerless struggle to be heard in the first place; social media can and should help change that reality, not reinforce it.”

But what about social media from, say, China? Consider that wildly popular app TikTok has 1.3 billion users around the world. TikTok is a China-owned company and as such, has been accused of censorship. Try searching for #hongkong on the platform and instead of seeing political news, TikTok users find “playful selfies, food photos and singalongs, with barely a hint of unrest in sight.”

From a “those who forget history are doomed to repeat it” point of view, consider that the average TikTok user is part of the highly impressionable age range of 13-24.

The Washington Post quotes Rohan Midha, managing director of U.K.-based marketing firm PYMB, who calls TikTok “a massively untapped platform that organizations can use to change the perceptions of a massive audience [and] users are quite young, so you can reach a young demographic who it might be easier to shape their perceptions outright.”

Delete, ignore, delete, ignore

Surely there are other social media outlets besides TikTok shaping the younger generation’s perceptions without censoring the digital flow of content, right?

Unfortunately, the complicated internet censorship issues we face are not just something affecting state-run countries that can’t deviate from socialist core values. Have you ever asked yourself what stays online and what gets deleted on various social media channels, including Facebook or Google?

If you haven’t, maybe you should. When we think about World Day Against Cyber Censorship, we must ask who it is that’s controlling what we see online.

Let’s take a deeper look at the top-five most-downloaded apps of 2019:

• • • Facebook Messenger
    • Facebook
    • WhatsApp Messenger
    • TikTok
    • Instagram

Notice anything interesting? One of those things is not like the other — specifically, China-owned TikTok is the only app not owned by Facebook.

Oh, good, you think? Not so fast. In case you haven’t watched it, the Sundance-favorite documentary The Cleaners is a powerful and disturbing look at how tech giants hire third-party companies to remove “objectionable” content. The moderators who are outsourced by these tech giants are the gatekeepers who choose whether to “delete or ignore” so-called objectionable pictures or videos. For example, the documentary showcases, albeit anonymously, the Manila-based Facebook screeners who are the digital janitors who ignore or delete about 25,000 posts a day.

The LA Times said this award-winning documentary was “disturbing on several levels,” while Variety called it “a thorough record of how our obsessive online culture has sunk to the low point it’s at today. Don’t expect any idea how to claw back out.”

As the film warns, the danger is that we might lose democracy because we’re willing to give it up.

Maybe it shouldn’t be so shocking we’re witnessing a decline in internet freedoms when you realize most Americans would give up their privacy for less than the cost of a grande Starbucks. One study shows that GDPR-savvy, privacy-conscious Germans would want to be paid about $8 per month in exchange for having Facebook share their personal information and ad preferences, whereas Americans would be satisfied with $3.50/month for the release of that same personal information.

Given the importance of data in the digital economy and the amount of data people share, that’s an alarmingly low number.

Protect your digital freedom

People are looking for alternatives and ways to be able to surf safely and anonymously. This is why millions of people around the world are taking matters into their own hands and using a virtual private network to get around online censorship. A VPN like CyberGhost masks Internet traffic and hides your IP address, making it impossible to be tracked online. Romania-based CyberGhost abides by a strict “no logs” policy and has no legal obligations under global intelligence agreements around the world.

What’s the future for freedom of expression in our digital age and how can you take action?

Here are some steps you can take to stay in control:

• • • • Use a VPN. A VPN is good for many things but when it comes to avoiding censors, a VPN will hide your IP address, effectively making it impossible for governments and advertisers to track you online. Hiding your IP address provides you with total online anonymity and a chance to experience true online freedom.
      • Clear your browser history. Even with a VPN hiding your IP address, it’s still recommended to clear your browser history so there’s no log of your internet activity.
      • Use HTTPS, not HTTP. Be vigilant about using encrypted websites, both on public networks and at home. This means you want to stay away from any website that starts with “http://” — it means there is no encryption. In fact, using CyberGhost as your VPN will force all your web traffic to HTTPS pages when available.
      • Avoid “free” wireless hotspots. Never conduct or send sensitive data on public WiFi — including passwords, social media profiles, bank account numbers, or other sensitive information.
      • Consider a different search engine. Let me Google that for you: DuckDuckGo; Bitclave; Gibiru; and StartPage are some great search engines that do not track or store a user’s personal information. (Unlike Google, which knows a lot about you!)

The fight for digital freedom of expression and limiting censors’ influence in our lives is more essential than ever.

China has been making headlines in the past few years.

Be it for exponential economic growth, US sanctions, or the biggest mass surveillance network, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) never fails to either impress or shock the audience.

China’s Great Firewall has been often mentioned online as the symbol of a modern-day dystopia and a self-sufficient censorship apparatus.

Few of us, outside of China, can really understand the intricacies of Chinese internet. But we do know that their network has developed into a significant spying and monitoring tool.

The digital totalitarian state now boasts more than 800 million internet users that it tightly holds under its control. China has also blocked the use of VPN and Social Media.

But this power might be spreading and impending freedom in Hong Kong as well.

Let’s take a closer look at what’s been happening in the area lately, and why it matters.

China: one country, two systems

To understand the relationship between China and Hong Kong, we need to start with their history.

It might sound peculiar, but Hong Kong has been a British colony for a long time.

The Qing dynasty ceded Hong Kong to the British Empire in 1842, ending the First Opium War. So, from 1842 up until 1997, Hong Kong was ruled by a governor appointed by the monarchy of the United Kingdom.

In 1997, the UK agreed to let Hong Kong return to Chinese sovereignty. This didn’t happen willy-nilly; conditions have been clearly stipulated in the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

The declaration ensured that Hong Kong would have its own “mini-constitution.” Its official name is the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.

Here are the most important points from it:

• • • • Hong Kong is a special Administrative Region within the People’s Republic of China.
      • Hong Kong has a high degree of autonomy in the executive, legislative, and judicial sectors.
      • Only permanent residents of Hong Kong have the right to vote on state matters.
      • Hong Kong’s capitalist system as a UK colony will not be changed for 50 years.
      • Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religious belief, and freedom of association will remain unimpeded as they were under British rule.
      • Arbitrary or unlawful arrests, as well as torture, are prohibited.
      • Citizens have the freedom to join trade unions and to strike.

These all sound pretty democratic, right?

Well, just to put things into perspective, think about this.

China’s Constitution describes the state as “a socialist state under the people’s democratic dictatorship”. It also places great emphasis on socialist law as a regulator of political behavior, but not so much on individual rights and duties.

As you can imagine, there’s not a whole lot of compatibility between the two constitutions. And it shows.

The people of Hong Kong haven’t had much experience with the censorship and control that governs over China’s internet.

This has been a waking call for the people in Hong Kong since the protests have started.

China’s long surveillance history

In some parts of the world, we’re used to the news of an upcoming protest circulating online. A Facebook event, a trending hashtag on Twitter, or just an influx of memes on Reddit are now common ways of spreading and reacting to the news.

But some governments try to be one step ahead. And this is especially true for China.

China paved its way for surveillance acceptance way before many other countries.

Let’s take it back a notch.

How it all started

Going as far back as the Ming dynasty in 1069, Chinese people were well familiar with the Baojia system.

Baojia was a community-based system of law enforcement. Basically, your neighbors and friends kept a close eye on you. You, in turn, kept a close eye on them. Anything out of the ordinary was to be rattled out to the authorities.

In the 1940s, when Mao Zedong rose to power, he took advantage of this pre-existing surveillance mindset and established his system of informants that would be the ears and eyes of the Communist Party.

The Social Credit System

In modern-day China, surveillance has even been integrated into the digital world. Under Xi Jinping’s rule, the aim is to “purify” the country of any “disruptive behavior.”

Today, China seems to have aced keeping track of its citizens using behaviorist social science and the Social Credit System. This is the national reputation system developed by the Chinese government.

What’s scary about the Social Credit System is how well it works and how accurately it can classify an individual.

But this might not come as a surprise if you think about how much time and planning went into it.

In 2009, the Social Credit System began its trials.

Then, in 2014, it launched a national pilot, with eight credit scoring firms: Sesame Credit, Tencent, and Baihe.com were amongst them.

In 2018, efforts were centralized under the People’s Bank of China.

Initially, the aim was to keep track of people who were not “on time” with money. This criterion was to be used to establish a citizen’s trustworthiness. This was later paired with an extensive mass surveillance system.

With CCTV cameras decorating the streets nationwide, constant monitoring of social media accounts, and government spyware pre-installed on any commercial device; privacy is now something virtually inexistent in China.

Each action captured by this pervasive surveillance network adds to Social Credit Scores.

For example, some things can get you in trouble and lower your Credit Score:

• • • • jaywalking,
      • eating while using public transport,
      • not sorting waste,
      • cheating in video games,
      • drunk driving,
      • failing to pay bills on time,
      • identity theft,
      • being religious.

The list of offenses is much longer and considers factors like age, location, employment status, and even pet ownership.

Other things can improve a Credit Score, such as donating blood, doing volunteer work, reading the teachings of the Communist Party, and so on.

One thing’s for sure: this score is affecting livelihoods, causing travel bans, reducing career perspectives, or the chance of finding love online.

According to the National Development and Reform Commission of China, 26.82 million air tickets and 5.96 million high-speed rail tickets have been denied to people who were deemed “untrustworthy” based on their score as of June 2019.

And this is only the beginning.

The Chinese government seems hell-bent to make sure nothing escapes their watchful eye.

Total digital Chinese surveillance

It’s not just real life that’s under intense scrutiny in China.

Nothing online is safe, either.

Behind the Great Firewall

In 1996, the Chinese government passed two online censorship bills.

The first bill requires all internet service providers in China to be approved by the government.

The second one regulates what can be labeled as “harmful content” and “malicious online activities.”

And no, it’s not about spreading ransomware or showcasing violent images. Instead, you are prohibited from harming the state or the party’s interests.

With such a broad definition, it’s no wonder the national internet infrastructure had to be contained within the government’s reach.

This is how the Great Firewall was born, featuring a complex system of blocking, filtering, and DNS poisoning in place. Now, all content that is deemed undesirable is blocked by default.

Any “mistakes” made on domestic websites are filtered and removed within hours.

Popular websites like Google, Facebook, and YouTube are replaced by their domestic counterparts, Weibo, WeChat, and Youku. These are constantly monitored and reviewed to make sure that the national regulations are well enforced.

Oh, and any international companies doing business in China also need to conform to these laws.

The golden age of WeChat

China passed its national security law in 2015. Now, all data collected on users is readily available to the authorities, at any time, for any reason.

This massive trove of data and government overreach shape the profile of each citizen. And that’s because the Chinese government took data mining to a whole different level.

You might already be familiar with the fact that corporations like Google or Facebook collect data on users and later turn into profit, with some disregard for personal digital privacy. But China managed to nationalize this business model.

Let’s take Tencent, for example.

The Chinese conglomerate holding company Tencent launched WeChat back in 2011.

The product started as a simple messaging app, much like WhatsApp. But it rapidly grew, adding more and more functionalities. Today it looks like the love child of Amazon, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Uber, Expedia, Venmo, Paypal, short-form podcasts, and even food delivery apps.

WeChat is now deeply embedded in everyday life. After all, it’s super convenient to have all your digital needs crafted into one single app.

But there is a price to be paid.

The CCP has access to all data generated through WeChat.

It all starts with a real name and phone number, both required for registering a WeChat account.

But then, if you order goods or food through WeChat, you’ll also give out your address. Hailing a cab means that you’re providing location data to the places you frequent. Any payment adds to your history of transactions and can help determine your habits, your interests, and your hobbies.

Yup, it’s exactly this type of data that decides your status and affects your chances of getting a job, a house, or a loan.

“But maybe, just like me, Chinese people have nothing to hide!” you might think. But you need to take context into account.

The digital systems governing lives are vulnerable to attacks and can become weaponized. And China is the country where even your complaints can get you into trouble.

This is what a Chinese man discovered for himself in 2019 when he was interrogated after complaining about police forces on QQ and WeChat.

So, now you might understand a bit better why the people of Hong Kong don’t want the CCP’s influence and policies shoved into their daily lives.

A recap of the Hong Kong protests

It all started in April 2019, with the introduction of a new bill. It would have led to criminals being deported to mainland China for conviction.

The official name was “The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation Bill.” But that’s quite a mouthful, so we’ll just refer to it as the “extradition bill.”

The extradition bill

So, what’s the deal with this proposal?

Well, in early 2018, Chan Tong-kai, a 19-year-old Hong Kong resident, murdered his pregnant girlfriend, Poon Hiu-wing, while the two were staying in a hotel room in Taipei, Taiwan.

After getting back to Hong Kong, justice could not be served. Even if Chan confessed to the crime, there is no agreement between the two regions to facilitate extraditing or charging him.

So, the pro-Beijing party Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong stepped in and pushed for a 2019 extradition law and put an end to any “legal loopholes.”

If you’re into law, you can read the whole deal here.

John Lee, the Secretary for Security, proposed the bill. He was quickly met with resistance from Taiwan’s authorities. The Law Society of Hong Kong also questioned the bill favoring extradition over meeting proof requirements.

What’s more, the people of Hong Kong considered this to be too much Chinese influence and started fearing unfair trials for criminals.

Because China and Hong Kong have different definitions for “political criminals,” there was this suspicion that China might mistreat journalists and activists if they were to be extradited.

The same went for “dissent.” So, the bill could be abused to prosecute those who criticized or even questioned the CCP’s policies.

Protests erupt

In June 2019, Hong Kong citizens started protesting the government’s plans to pass the extradition bill. One of their locations? The airport.

As a result, the people of Hong Kong were now making news all around the world.

Activity on community forums like r/HongKong soared. Memes and hashtags like #StandwithHongKong helped further spread information.

Coordinated social media efforts also shed light on police brutality, like when a nurse at an anti-government rally in Tsim Sha Tsui was shot with a beanbag round, which caused her a lose an eye.

And because social activism sometimes pays off, protesters managed to get the bill got suspended.

Five demands

However, the people of Hong Kong still feared that the bill might be revived.

The protests escalated, now with a new set of demands attached.

Protesters called for “Five demands, not one less!“. They wanted:

• • • • For the protests not to be characterized as a “riot;”
      • Amnesty for arrested protesters;
      • An independent inquiry into the alleged police brutality;
      • The implementation of complete universal suffrage;
      • A complete withdrawal of the extradition bill.

In September 2019, the bill was finally completely withdrawn.

But the citizens of Hong Kong kept protesting. After all, they had four more demands to be met.

At the same, the authorities started cracking down on the protesters in attempts to contain the situation.

A cat-and-mouse game

The more the police fired tear gas and rubber bullets at the crowds, the more people would take to the streets.

Minors also joined the protests, sparking controversies.

On the one hand, parents were criticized for letting teenagers attend potentially violent rallies.

But, on the other hand, the police were also accused of searching and arresting underage citizens. For more details, you can turn to this news about three teenagers who were taken by the police, leaving their parents with no way of getting in touch with them.

Even more violence in the streets

On October 1st, 2019, the PCC celebrated its 70th anniversary. In Hong Kong, that was one of the most brutal days of protest.

An 18-year old was shot while the people of Hong Kong fought off the police.

A pro-Beijing lawmaker was stabbed in the streets. Another protestor was shot by a policeman.

Protests reached a new level in November when the government banned protesters from wearing face masks.

The mask ban was a red flag for protesters. They toppled smart lamp posts, suspecting they might be used for spying, as the Chinese government continued to crack down on Hong Kong’s people.

The events also turned violent more often, with shots fired indiscriminately, targeting even foreign journalists.

Tear gas also became an often occurrence at the protests.

A 15-year-old boy was struck on the head by a tear gas canister in Tin Shui Wai.

Police were even shooting live fire rounds at unarmed protestors.

However, Carrie Lam, the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, refused to call out the human rights abuses.

Moving forward

It’s uncertain what the future holds for Hong Kong.

It’s 2020, and the protesters are still in the street, fighting the authorities.

One thing’s for sure, though.

The Sino-British Joint Declaration designated 2047 as the date for the complete overtake of Hong Kong by China. This no longer appears to be a realistic deadline.

The people of Hong Kong have made it clear: they reject the nationalistic and dictatorial regime of the CCP, even if the Chinese government seems hell-bent on restoring what it perceives to be the one true country.

Lam’s extradition bill sparked the demonstrations. But now they’re a push for democracy.

Digital life in the times of the Hong Kong protests

As you can imagine, the CCP kept a close eye on the Hong Kong protests.

They tried to identify protestors.

At the same time, demonstrators were willing to find out the names of brutal police officers.

It was maybe the first time people here grasped the importance of anonymity and privacy.

A Telegram leak

Telegram, the cloud-based instant messaging and voice over IP service, played an essential role in helping organize and shape the protests.

However, things took a turn for the worst when a bug leaked users’ phone numbers.

Per reports, an attacker can add tens of thousands of sequential phone numbers to a phone’s address book. The attacker then connects to a Telegram channel where protests are being organized and syncs their contacts with the Telegram app. A state law enforcement agency, or intelligence service, can then force local mobile telcos to disclose the names of the persons behind those phone numbers. In the case of the Hong Kong protests, Chinese officials could get a list of people who organized or coordinated protests via Telegram.

Catalin Cimpanu for Zero Day on August 23, 2019

Protesters now knew they had to be more careful in protecting their digital anonymity.

Turning to Bridgefy

After the Telegram issues, the people of Hong Kong turned to mesh messaging apps to bypass China’s deep surveillance network tracking.

As the threat of an internet shutdown grew, people chose Bridgefy, a developer-friendly SDK that can be easily integrated into Android and iOS mobile apps to make them work without the internet. It renders China’s online tracking systems useless.

Barring human rights

In the meantime, Hong Kong’s privacy watchdog received more than 4,700 complaints about doxxing since the social unrest began in June. According to a report, about 30% of the cases concerned government and police supporters, and 10% were filed by the anti-government protesters.

Even the head of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth, was also denied entry to Hong Kong, despite having visited freely beforehand. But this time, he wanted to present a report on how the Chinese government is trying to undermine the international human rights system.

Fake news on the rise

As a state with a functioning and well-funded propaganda apparatus, the CCP was quick to push their fake news of the events.

A good way to tell if the news piece you’re watching if influenced by the Chinese authorities is to pay attention to the vocabulary used:

• • • • Protestors are referred to as “rioters.”
      • Tourists in Hong Kong are often described as foreign spies.
      • There is often the mention of “US influence” or “US actors.”
      • There is more focus on the police and the People’s Liberation Army.

The bigger picture

In November 2019, US President Donald Trump made a political statement by signing into law an act supporting the protests in Hong Kong. The “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act” passed in Congress with bipartisan support.

This was a critical stance to take against Chinese interference and dominance.

But, the truth is a lot of governments have been inspired by China’s Great Firewall.

The Russians are experimenting with their own alternative to the global internet.

China has also massively invested in Uzbekistan’s network infrastructure. Let’s just say, people doubt it’s for a purely philanthropic reason.

Ecuador is a developing country that felt mass surveillance technology would help propel them socially. China’s CCTV network has been named as the main inspiration for this project.

Also, let’s not forget that Xi Jinping showed interest in oil-rich Venezuela. Beijing publicly stood by Maduro’s government, even after suffering financial losses.

This made many question China’s motives. While speculations range from oil to merely being a nuisance to the US, the Venezuelan opposition also claims that China might be aiding Maduro in cutting off internet access.

The race of digital supremacy

China’s rapid tech development in the tech industry didn’t go unnoticed by foreign investors.

Major Chinese tech companies, among which Huawei, Hikvision, Dahua, and ZTE, proposed to supply artificial intelligence surveillance technology in Western countries, helping the creation of smart cities. Germany, Spain, and France have already signed deals.

But privacy activists are worried all data this technology generates will end up straight into the hands of Beijing officials.

And if you are quick to dismiss these claims, you should know that China invests heavily to expand the CCP influence abroad. For example, Freedom House published a research paper on how Chinese propaganda, content curation, and censorship has spread beyond East Asia.

Here’s what China is doing:

• • • • Chinese state media outlets like People’s Daily, CGTN, and China Daily, are active global social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram and often use misleading taglines and partake in deceptive promotional ads
      • In countries like Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria, TV packages that include international options like the BBC World Service cost more than basic packages with local channels and Chinese state media.
      • In 2017, Chinese tech giant ZTE signed an agreement with state-owned Pakistan Television Corporation (PTV) to expand digital television services, particularly to rural and remote regions.
      • Huawei is the company that led the transition from analog to digital television in Cuba.
      • WeChat is expanding in much of Asia, attracting non-Chinese speakers in countries like the Philippines, Malaysia, and India.
      • In Canada, WeChat censors deleted a member of Parliament’s message to constituents praising Hong Kong’s protesters.
      • In Peru, there has been little to no serious media coverage related to environmental and labor controversies that have periodically affected Chinese operations in the country’s extractive industries.
      • In Australia, most Chinese publications are pro-Beijing. Likewise, in New Zealand, a long-term effort by the CCP to influence Chinese media coverage and local communities have had a profound impact on the local 2017 elections.
      • When Xi Jinping visited Papua New Guinea in 2018, local and international journalists were barred from covering his meeting with eight regional leaders. They were told instead to use reporting by Xinhua or video from CCTV as the basis for their coverage.
      • The satellite firm Eutelsat of France cut its transmission of NTDTV to China, apparently in exchange for the opportunity to broadcast Xinhua’s English news channel in Europe.
      • TikTok, another app from China, emerged as one of the most downloaded applications worldwide in 2019. About 60 percent of the app’s monthly active users reportedly reside in the United States.

Mobile is eating the world

China is also one of the most important players in the smartphone market.

Among the seven most sold smartphone brands globally in the past two years, five of them are produced by the Chinese tech companies Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, vivo, and Realme.

ZTE has also sold tens of millions of smartphones around the world over the past years.

Since most of these are significantly cheaper than their Apple and Samsung counterparts, it’s no wonder that their popularity and demand increased.

However, many have questioned China’s involvement in the mobile technology sector. The main concern is whether these devices can be used for surveillance and data mining.

In early 2018, six US intelligence agencies issued a warning, urging US citizens not to use commercial products offered by Huawei and ZTE. Lawmakers also considered a bill that would ban government employees from using Huawei and ZTE phones altogether, in the name of national security.

UK’s National Cyber Security Centre also had similar findings and advised telecommunication companies in the country to avoid products and services offered by ZTE.

Samantha Hoffman is an analyst of Chinese security issues at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. In her paper, Engineering Global Consent: The Chinese Communist Party’s Data-Driven Power Expansion, she explains how data can easily be misused by the CCP.

If you go back to even the late 1970s and early 80s, the way the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) talks about technology is as a tool of social management. It’s a way of not only coercive control, but also sort of cooperative control where you participate in your own management. It’s this idea of shaping the environment, shaping how people think, how they’re willing to act before they even know they’re making a choice. That’s the party’s idea.

Samantha Hoffman in an interview with The Guardian

So, digital data is important to the CCP. Your digital data is important to the CCP.

A checklist for your digital privacy today

Since you can never really know who is trying to sell your data and which platform is owned by a Chinese company, it’s essential to protect your digital life.

Online threats are always lurking, but if you are currently in Hong Kong, you’ll also have the CCP’s tactics to worry about.

Here’s where you should begin:

• • • • Use a VPN to protect your online anonymity and to stay safe of government surveillance.
      • Safeguard all your accounts with complex passwords. You can use a password manager. This will also make it easier to change your password frequently.
      • Use two-factor authentication whenever it’s available.
      • Always use https:// connections. Some security apps like VPNs have this feature, but extensions like HTTPS Everywhere are also available.
      • Keep your OS and software updated. Make sure always to install security patches.
      • Avoid social media channels that collect your data and sell it to third parties, since they could easily compromise you.
      • Be careful to check out tracking cookies featured on websites and delete them regularly.
      • Read the Terms & Conditions of any service, app, or site you are using to check what you are getting into.
      • Pay attention to what permissions your apps request. Keep an eye out for any suspicious permission.
      • Be cautious about what you share online. Don’t post personal information.
      • Don’t open suspicious email. If you do so by accident, make sure not to click on any links or download any attachments.
      • Use an antivirus.
      • Pay attention to any misspelled URLs. This is called typosquatting and is often used by scammers who are trying to impersonate a legitimate company.
      • Never give credit card details or passwords. No reputable company will ask for these as proof of your identity.
      • Check shortened links to see where they are leading you to.
      • Use an ad-blocker to avoid clicking on suspicious ads.

While these actions might not keep you 100% safe from malicious intent, they will keep most threats at bay.

Even if you’ve heard of calls to boycotting Chinese products, you might not be able to avoid them completely especially since it takes a lot of digging to find out which Chinese companies masquerade behind shady ownerships with loose privacy policies.

So, make sure you do your due diligence to protect your data online.

Don’t give up hope

The abuses of the Chinese authorities might seem like something out of a movie, but they’re a reality the people of Hong Kong got a taste of.

But they’re choosing to fight and try to uphold democratic values.

Freedom of expression lies at the core of a free and open society. And privacy is key in preventing government overreach.

Whether you’re a tourist in Hong Kong or a local, make sure you take care of yourself. Keep your private life out of the CCP’s hands and be mindful of how your online activity could be traced back to you.

Stay safe, Ghostie!